“EU Leaders reject May over “hard Brexit” talks” says the
Times, continuing the relentless rear-guard action on behalf of the sulking
Remainers. The finger wagging extends to
the Times leader where we are told that we should aim for “as integrated a trade
agreement as possible and a compromise on immigration.”
There is a well-known adage that when one is up to one’s
arse in alligators it is sometimes difficult to remember that the original aim
was to drain the swamp.
The British electorate, on June 23rd 2016, quite
simply, voted to leave the EU. That is; to
regain sovereignty over immigration and law-making and to forge our own trading
arrangements with the rest of the world.
Let us, therefore, concentrate on achieving the aim and accept that
whatever remains is the consequence thereof.
There is no such thing as a perfect world.
The metaphorical alligators, politicians throwing spokes in
the negotiating wheel at every opportunity, should reflect upon Matt Ridley,
quoting John Longworth (also in The Times today):
“Trade consists of a willing
seller and a willing buyer. If the buyer
wants a product and it is the right quality and price there will be a
trade. Governments do not trade, they
only get in the way.”
The best thing that politicians can now do is recognise the
limits of their competence and get on with enacting the will of the people. Do we really have so little faith in our
business and industry that we need a bunch of pious MPs to tell us how to
trade?
Excellent analysis. One could say it was those same politicians (or their equivalents) who deceived us into the European 'project' in the first place.
ReplyDelete