A few weeks ago, breaking my mood of constant despair over
the Brexit process, I shared with some friends an idea that could break the
ideological deadlock in Parliament. My
reasoning was this: despite the “Surrender Act,” Brussels still frets that
Boris could, indeed, leave with no deal on 31 October. Although the EU, in public, claims to be able
to shrug off the loss of the UK, in private, they are desperately worried of
the potential economic shock which could tip the balance in recession threatened
continental Europe – the EU needs a deal.
Boris needs a deal too. Despite
the bravado of the no ifs and buts strategy of leaving on 31 October, he must
know that whatever constitutional sharp practice might be necessary to circumvent
the “Surrender Act” would be challenged in the courts and probably on the
streets. His only hope is to do a deal
with Brussels and then get Parliament to agree it. Some hope – Parliament has
already shown that, in the greater interest of defying the referendum
altogether, they will frustrate and block any measure that promotes a path to
the UK actually leaving the EU. But
suppose Boris cooks up a deal with the EU which, as far as the EU is concerned,
looks like Mrs May’s deal and, as far as Boris is concerned, satisfies the DUP
over backstop provisions and changes the political declaration sufficiently
to alter the Parliamentary arithmetic?
I very much doubt that even that would not be good enough to neutralise
the wreckers whose sole object is to stay in the EU. However, suppose the deal came with strings
from the EU – accept the deal or reject it but there is no extension to the
deadline for the UK exit. Parliament
would then be faced with a simple binary choice, no ifs or buts, vote for the
deal or leave without a deal by default on 31 October. That should concentrate a few honourable
minds! Under the circumstances, the
chances of Parliament voting for the new deal look quite good. Brussels should be reasonably confident that
Parliament would oblige so there would be relatively little risk in them
caveating the deal with “no further extension.” Even better for Brussels, with the real threat of no extension hanging over Parliament, they should not have to concede much from Mrs May's hopeless effort in order to get the new deal to pass.
Of course, the new deal will be a poor deal for the UK. Doubtless we will still be liable to pay out
billions for many years ahead and will be unlikely to be able to throw off,
significantly, the shackles of the single market and customs union. People will continue to come and go as they please,
agriculture will remain a basket case and Scottish fishermen will be
disappointed. We’ll probably even commit
to the European Army and the Euro in due course. But we will be out and, from there, anything could
be possible. Half a loaf anyone?
No comments:
Post a Comment