The new edition of The Spectator arrived this morning and
added to the seemingly endless media speculation about the current Brussels negotiations.
I was struck by the opening paragraph of the leading article:
"David Cameron's attempt to renegotiate
Britain's membership has served as powerful reminder of the case for leaving. The EU is designed in such a way that almost
no sensible proposal can be passed. If one
member state has a good idea, the other 27 members demand a price for approving
it, or they demand concessions until it is completely watered down. If the leader
of a country protests, the response is clear: What are you going to do? You wouldn't
dare."
Quite, and if, as expected, some sort of "deal" is
cobbled together later today, what should we do next?
On 23 January 2013, in his EU Speech at Bloomberg, David
Cameron outlined his vision for Europe.
Many of us, subsequently classified as swivel-eyed loons who should be
ignored by the MPs they assisted to elect, were placated. We thought David Cameron should be given a
chance and that should he be able to deliver meaningful change as outline in
his speech then, maybe, he should enjoy our support. He concluded his speech by saying:
"I
know there will be those who say the vision I have outlined will be impossible
to achieve. That there is no way our partners will co-operate. That the British
people have set themselves on a path to inevitable exit. And that if we aren’t
comfortable being in the EU after 40 years, we never will be.
But
I refuse to take such a defeatist attitude - either for Britain or for Europe."
The draft agreement of the current negotiations has been
described as "thin gruel" and "absolutely nothing." As I
write, sticking points are being watered down to accommodate the stately dance
so eloquently described in my quote from The Spectator. It seems likely that there will be some sort
of deal but it will rapidly unpick and be exposed as the elegant form of words
that it is - an undeliverable and unenforceable load of Euro-babble. Surely David Cameron could not insult our
intelligence by trying to sell us such a dodgy dossier? Time to admit defeat, honourably? And surely other
good men of importance, hitherto holding their peace, who see the folly of
tying ourselves to the mast of the sinking EU will now speak out effectively?
The rump of Selby & Ainsty with Elmet and Rothwell
Conservative Party Forum, pending official sanction from the national
organisation, meets next Tuesday to discuss our response to our respective
MPs. I look forward to a very lively
meeting!
No comments:
Post a Comment