Wednesday, 24 February 2016

Military Security and the EU



The letter from retired Chiefs of the Defence Staff  in the Telegraph today argues that we can collaborate more effectively within the EU to confront challenges to European security.  Fine.  However, the letter goes on to say that "our firm veto over EU foreign policy decisions guarantees not only that we will never be forced to join EU initiatives that are against our strategic interest."  Indeed, but what is sauce for the goose also affects the gander and foreign affairs that are in British national interest could equally be vetoed by our EU colleagues.  Far from providing collective strength, EU foreign policy offers only a cat's cradle of national self-interest leading to inaction at worst and insipid compromise at best.  Better the alliance has served us well for over 50 years, NATO, in which we know exactly where we stand!

PS, at least they did not trot out the argument that the EU has been effective in putting out the fire in Ukraine that its own hubristic overtures started in the first place!

1 comment:

  1. Your PS is well stated, John. I'm disappointed that the retired chiefs have been 'encouraged' to join the debate on the 'Remain' team. All of them have become part of the hierarchy of the establisment (in the case of Jock - especially so!); they are out of touch with the 'indigenous' population whose primary concern is excessive immigration. By remaining in the EU, we should pay attention to the following quote: "A nation can perhaps survive open borders; a nation can perhaps survive a generous welfare system. But no nation can survive both"

    ReplyDelete