With a pause in election reporting some newspapers have
filled their front pages with the PM’s broadside against the EU and its
officialdom. I am at a loss to
understand the obsession, led by the BBC Channel 4 and the Liberal Democrats,
about the importance of “finding a deal” during the EU exit negotiations when a
perfectly good arrangement already exists.
If it aint broke, don’t fix it. This is how it should go:
Good morning. I represent the interests of the United
Kingdom and you, if I am not mistaken, represent the disparate self-interest of
the other 27 nations comprising the EU? We have already stated our commitment
to full cooperation in, amongst other things, defence, security, and human
rights. We think this discussion is
principally about access to each other’s markets. We have, as you know, a very
good trading arrangement in place amongst ourselves – not perfect but given the
national self-interest, mentioned above, the best arrangement in the
circumstances. It is our wish to continue that arrangement when the UK leaves
the EU. Is that also the wish of the
other 27?
I’ll take that as a no then?
The UK will, therefore, rely on
WTO uniform tariffs in future trade (I’ll leave you gentlemen to do your
respective math).
Good heavens, is it time for
lunch already?
What a good line John. Do our negotiators have the wit to take it?
ReplyDelete