As I said the other day, I attended
a meeting of our constituency executive the purpose of which was to endorse the
reselection of our sitting parliamentary representative. We were presented with a rather weak resume of
the Brexit situation and the hand-wringing difficulty of getting a deal over
the line. Apparently, the problem lay
with various factions of entrenched opinion, for and against and our MP kindly listed
the runners and riders for us. When I
spoke, I pointed out that there was one faction of opinion that he had omitted to
mention – those who say they want to get a Brexit deal over the line but really
want to Remain. I expressed
disappointment in those MPs who supported Mrs May’s Remain Minus sell-out and concluded
my remarks with the statement that, with many key votes in future, there would
be no blank cheque from me now. The MP
asked me what my question was – I replied that my remarks were not a question,
simply a statement of which way I intended to vote. We then had a secret ballot the result of
which was that our MP was reselected.
After the meeting, to clear the air, I had a private word saying notwithstanding
my earlier remarks, I fully accepted the majority decision and that he could
count upon my full support in other matters in the future. Come to think of it,
isn’t that the way democracy is supposed to work when electors have been faced with a
binary choice?
No comments:
Post a Comment