The EU has rebuffed the Prime Minister’s generous offer
about the residency rights of EU citizens after we leave the EU. Michel Barnier has demanded exactly the same
rights for European citizens as under existing free movement rules. Presumably Barnier feels that once a citizen
has acquired rights then they should retain them and that EU citizens living in
the UK after Brexit should be subject to exactly the same rights as any other
EU citizen living in any other EU country.
He does not seem to grasp that post Brexit UK will be a sovereign
country and not subject to free movement rules (or the ECJ). So, two snags strike
me. Firstly, what if, post Brexit, EU
citizens’ rights change? For example,
suppose, in the future, EU citizens acquire rights about euthanasia that are
not lawful in the UK. Is UK expected to
grant those new rights to those former EU citizens that were assimilated during
Brexit? Secondly, how will it be possible
to govern our country wherein a substantial minority are subject to a different
code of law? There is a simple solution
to this impasse. EU citizens living in
UK should either accept Mrs May’s pragmatic offer or return from whence they
came – there are plenty, around the world, who would be happy to take their
place.
Thursday 29 June 2017
Tuesday 27 June 2017
Cam Force One - Not Such Value for Money?
Back in December 2015 I wrote about the illusionary
accounting procedures used to make the RAF “Voyager” air-to-air refuelling
tanker fleet, operated as a Private Finance Initiative, value for money to the
tax payer. The Times today has been rummaging
through the Royal and Ministerial air travel statistics. However, far from agreeing that converting
one of the surplus fleet of Voyagers to be a VIP transport would be good value
for money, the Time concludes that “it does not look so cheap after all.” The Times report is still missing the point –
it is much worse than that. As I
explained in my piece on 1 December 2015, “Tanker Aircraft, PFI and the PMs
Private Jet,” Royal and Ministerial users of the VIP jet only pay the operating
costs. This does, indeed, look very good
value for money. However, if the true
cost of providing the aircraft in the first place, currently being paid by the MOD,
every month over the 27 years of the contract, to the PFI contractor were
published then the hourly rates would be truly eye-watering. The VIP aircraft conversion, “Cam Force One,”
makes the best of a one-sided contract but that does not make it value for
money.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)