I have never liked Amber Rudd, personally, nor warmed to her
interpretation of modern Conservatism. Nevertheless, she was doing her job so
her passing from an otherwise struggling government is regrettable. Meantime, I
find it astonishing that the media should be concerned or surprised that he
government has a plan to deal with illegal immigration - that's the, probably,
hundreds of thousands of people who have fraudulently entered UK and are taking
advantage of our facilities (to the detriment of those here legally and who are
paying for their privileges). That a plan to reduce illegal immigration, in
accordance with the manifesto, involves aims and targets and is being pursued vigorously
is equally unremarkable, nay expected!
Speculation
on who should replace her is natural but the media appears obsessed with the
notion that the Prime Minister should find a new Home Secretary who supports
remaining in Europe. This, apparently, is to preserve the delicate balance
between leavers and remainers in the Cabinet. It is this delicate balance, of
course, by ensuring that nothing of substance is agreed or carried forward,
that is responsible for the lack of progress of government efforts to extricate
ourselves from the EU. The delicate balance comprises the 50%, the remain fifth
column, dedicated to overturning the Referendum. If Mrs May really believes in
leaving the EU, she should appoint a Home Secretary who shares that vision.
Amber Rudd will cause enough trouble on the back benches without appointing a
further champion of sympathy within.
The
new Home Secretary will have a difficult job fighting to fire storm of the
Windrsush debacle, the embers of which will continue to be fanned by those with
a grievance on behalf of those, apparently, affected. A massive distraction for the media and
public opinion could help – perhaps a plan to introduce ID cards?