Wednesday 31 July 2019

Red Kites


Reading the newspaper in the conservatory after breakfast I was, at the same time, keeping an eye on a Red Kite perched at the top of tree about 150 yards away.  The tree overlooks a farmer's field, long neglected, and now over-run with rabbits.  The perch seems to be a favourite because yesterday I saw two kites jostling for the same position.  Interestingly, the Kite seems to tolerate pigeons using the same vantage point but not its fellow species.  By remarkable coincidence, the Nature Notes in the Times today, Derwent May talks about Kites, specifically the much rarer Black Kite but this was definitely a red variety.  A photo opportunity was too good to miss so here is my effort.  I used a tripod and zoom lens, the equivalent of about 600 mm on my 4/3 Olympus E3. I took the shot at 1/250 at F6.3. I cropped the image in Photoshop and adjusted the exposure slightly, compensating the bright, but featureless, sky with a graduated filter.

Tuesday 23 July 2019

Westward, look, the land is bright!


I don’t know much about Jo Swinson other than the Liberal Democrat party have just elected her as their leader. I have no idea how she will perform in this role and, as a member of the Conservative Party, it does not seem proper me to comment on whether she is fit for the job or not. However, she has made a robust start to her tenure by making clear her outright opposition to Britain leaving the EU and, we may suppose, her wholehearted support for Britain remaining in.  Bollocks to the referendum then?

Just like the Conservatives were accused of banging on about Brexit, so Ms Swinson seems intent on re-fighting the leave or remain debate of 2016.  It reminds me of when our children were small and my friend Norman was staying at our house in Kings Lynn. It was Grand National day and, prior to the race on television, each of us had chosen our favourite to win. The result of the race brought disappointment with none of the horses and riders chosen making the frame, let alone mentioned in the commentary. To cheer the mood Norman advanced a brilliant suggestion, “why don’t we watch the replay and see if your horses do any better next time?” Swinson must be hoping for a similar fairy-tale?  My children duly watched the race again but, unfortunaletly, the result did not change, a slautory lesson in the fairness of life, perhaps? Undeterred by fairness, the “energetic and passionate” Swinson has promised to “do whatever it takes,” to stop Brexit. However, even by the banal standards of debate that pass for politics these days, her reasoning lacked depth. In fairness, she correctly identified that the issue is about the fundamental direction of our country for generations but then failed to capitalise on her moment of media attention by explaining just what was so bloody marvellous about being a member of the EU for future generations. She cannot have been thinking about jobs and employment, particularly amongst young people in Spain and Italy, for example. Neither could she have given much thought to immigration policy and how our public services, schools and hospitals would cope with the sort of influx that Germany has experienced. And whilst talking about Germany she really ought to mention their growth rate, teetering on the edge of recession (so much for Kamal Ahmed and the BBC propaganda). With the election of an overtly federalist hierarchy in Brussels, how will she sell the advertised drive to budgetary integration and the usurpation of national parliamentary authority for taxing and spending? Whilst on the subject of further integration, the old apology of staying in the heart of Europe so that we can reform the EU from within looks somewhat hollow, given the federalist direction of travel.  Does she really think that Marron’s European army would provide better security than NATO, our steadfast guardian since the aftermath of WWII? Will she ignore the opportunities that freedom from political and economic shackles will expose? Is it not possible that, without the millstone of the common external tariff, there are likely to be a myriad of business opportunities in markets hitherto ignored uneconomic? Does she really think the British business is so moribund, EU-dependent, and generally useless, that it cannot go out and make a success of these opportunities?

In sum, she has a hard sell on her hands, as they say. Perhaps she is hoping that the debate does not sink to such inconvenient detail and, led by the ever-trustworthy BBC, she will have plenty of allies in the media to keep banging on about cliff edges and catastrophe, without actually exposing why and how. I very much look forward to seeing how she gets on.

That said, it never does to relish the misfortune of others so we should focus on the positive.  Today, having listened to Boris make his acceptance speech, there should be a new spring in the steps of Conservatives. I do not feel despondent. I am energised. I believe in delivering and making a success of Brexit, of being part of a united party and, above all, defeating Jeremy Corbyn or whoever may succeed him as head of the extreme left.  Boris is poised at the starting gate – lets back him to win.

Sunday 21 July 2019

Another "Crash Out" Hyperbole



England Crash Out (of netball World Cup) reads a headline in the The Times Sport section today.  In current parlance, “crash out” has been adopted by those opposing “no-deal” to suggest a tsunami of catastrophic consequences of UK that will visit the UK should we actually fulfil the mandate of the referendum and leave the EU when we said we will.  Naturally I was concerned for the future welfare of the persons comprising the England women’s netball team and wondered what terrible fate awaited them.  Surely, they should be relelgated to at least the third division and never compete on the world stage again for such would be the irredeemable consequences for sport in general and netball in particular.  So, I read on.  The team were “gutted” but certainly did not sound down and out.  They praised the opposition for being “clinical” in their shooting which seems to have parallels with our negotiation surrender over the last three years.  However, the captain noted that, despite the defeat, life must go on and that it was pointless to sit back and wonder what if?  Quite so.  Let us in the UK get out of the EU on 31 October, put the debacle of the last three years behind us and show that we are determined to make a success of our future, like the England netball team?

Tuesday 16 July 2019

More Cricket Balls


The salivation in anticipation of a popularity dividend following England’s remarkable victory in the final of the Cricket World Cup may be premature.  Those hoping that the exploits of England’s tiny elite group of players will inspire crowds to come and watch and youngsters to come and play the World Cup 50-over form of the game should keep an eye on what is happening to the cricket calendar next season.  The introduction of the city based “Hundred” competition, specifically designed, we were told, for “people who don’t like cricket,” may have some unintended consequences.  In particular, it will quarantine a large group of established county and international players for a substantial and attractive part of the season, the school summer holidays.  Each of the eight teams will pick a “boundary smashing” squad of 15 players ready to play cricket at its “wildest fastest best,” hardly the most realistic training environment for the more nuanced World Cup format of the game.  Neither does that leave much talent left over to play in the county-based 50-over competition. Thus, paradoxically, the Hundred Competition will asphyxiate the County 50 Over game which is the very training environment for the international competition upon which the cricket authorities seek to capitalise.  By neglect, the County 50 Over game will be relegated to second eleven quality. With the greatest respect to aspiring cricketers in county second elevens, how many fans will pay to watch them?  And, more importantly, how will young talent progress to England’s elite 50-over squad if they are denied the opportunity of playing and competing with the best in their formative years?