Thursday 29 November 2018

Who Will Vote for Remain Minus?


As Project Fear 2.0 revs up, I do not believe it an exaggeration to view the differences over the PM’s lousy Brexit Deal as a potential catalyst that could split the Conservative Party for a generation if not for ever.  Almost every manifesto point upon which the hapless Mrs May was elected has been conceded and, of course, there will be more to come over freedom of movement, fishing, and Gibraltar as the negotiations for a future relationship move forward.

I read that the Prime Minister is urging her MPs to talk to their constituents about the deal but the silence from ours, unless I have missed it, is deafening.  In any case, I very much doubt that a significant number of the 30,532 out of 51,639 votes cast in Selby will have changed their mind.  This would surely provide a clear direction to my MP in the future parliamentary vote – or perhaps not since he is now on the Government payroll?

No 10 policy now appears to be trying to sell the deal directly to voters, over the heads of MPs.  These, by the way, are the same voters who, in another breath from the PM, are supposed to be fed up with all the negotiation and just want the Government to get on with it. Meantime, we are told that Government Whips are telling remain supporters that they should vote for the deal or risk a no deal exit whilst, simultaneously, leave supporters are being urged to support the deal or risk an even softer exit.  Presumably, the Whips must hope that the rival camps do not compare notes?

When it comes to the meaningful vote, in a desperate release of damage limitation propaganda, I hear that No 10 are putting it about that if Mrs May loses by, only, less than 100 parliamentary votes then that will be sufficient vindication for her to carry on regardless.  Good grief! I hope my MP votes with his conscience and when he does I urge him to think very carefully at the legacy of bitterness that siding with PM’s deal could leave.  I cannot believe that any rational democrat could vote for this deal on its merits.  A vote in favour will be, blatantly, a vote in support for a hapless and discredited Prime Minister who has made a complete hash of the Brexit negotiation.  That, in conscience, will not be good enough.

Friday 23 November 2018

A Flying Instructor at RAF Church Fenton


On Yorkshire Day, enjoying cricket at Headingley earlier this year, I was reminded of my first encounter with the County back in early 1969.  “Let me speak plainly Brown: I run a very experienced outfit here at primary Flying Squadron and brand- new instructors like you dilute the quality of the unit.”  Thus, was I welcomed to Church Fenton in North Yorkshire (just) by my new Commanding Officer, Squadron Leader Cecil Jonklaas. Primary Flying Squadron (PFS) had formed a few years earlier as flying training reversed its previous policy of all jet training (straight through from ab-initio to “Wings” on the Jet Provost aircraft) to provide 30 hours of instruction in the single piston Chipmunk trainer for those pilot entrants who had not completed a flying scholarship as schoolboys or who had otherwise no previous flying experience.  The logic was that those young men who would be unlikely to make the grade on the jet could be filtered out earlier on the less expensive Chipmunk.  Its worth pointing out, in retrospect, that mastering the Chipmunk required the acquisition of numerous motor skills that would never be required on future types.  One could argue, however, that such negative training could be justified on the basis that if you could master the tricky, tail-dragging, little Chipmunk, you probably had the necessary inherent hand, eye, and brain coordination to manage on other types later.  I’ll come back to that.

I had found my way to Church Fenton by way of a 6-month training course at the Central Flying School at RAF Little Rissington in Gloucestershire.  In those days we needed instructors for the Chipmunk and Jet Provost, basic, and the Gnat and Varsity for multi engine and fast jet advanced training respectively.  You could volunteer for any role but you were largely typecast by your previous flying experience – it was unlikely that an ex Beverley pilot would be posted to instruct on the Gnat (but the opposite wasn’t always untrue).  Most of the basic cannon fodder opted for the Jet Provost from where the future opportunity to escape to more glamorous fighter pastures was highest.  On the other hand, basic training on the Chipmunk, usually at a University Air Squadron, of which, in those days, there were a great many, carried greater promise for quality of life and early responsibility.  Unfortunately in my case, a previous scandalous, by the standards of the time, association with a lady at my previous station, had somewhat marked my supervisory card.  Along with homosexuality, people took a generally dim view of such things in those days.  A one-side interview with the Commandant of the Central Flying School and the threat of action under QR1021 left me somewhat disadvantaged.  Who after all, in a one man and his dog University Air Squadron, remote from administrative support, would welcome the possibility onerous paper-work?  Fortunately, my CFS Instructor, the legendary John Snell, really stuck his neck out for me and I was allowed to continue the course from which I graduated, comfortably, as a B2 (under supervision) Qualified Flying Instructor.  But it was to Church Fenton in the Vale of York and not White Waltham and London SW1, where I was sent (and another one-sided interview with my new boss).

Although, theoretically qualified to instruct students in the art of flying, local procedures and organisational governance required various check rides with the supervisory hierarchy.  I couldn’t have offended anyone on this process because my log book records that I was let loose on a real student a couple of days later.  Although the introductory process was very formal, once completed, I was left very much to my own devices.  The daily routine began with a meteorological briefing for all staff and students.  A “Duty Instructor” was nominated for the day and his duties began with collecting all the weather and operational information before presenting a briefing to the assembled company.  Based on the expected weather, one of the supervisors would declare a “flying phase” effectively defining the extent of flying operations for the time ahead.  For example, the flying phase limited whether student pilots could fly solo, both in the immediate vicinity of the airfield and further afield.  If the weather was good, there would be few restrictions on solo flying but if the weather was poor, then flying would be restricted to dual (student and instructor) operations only and shades in between.  After the met brief staff and students dispersed to the Squadron facilities for the day’s duties.

The days duties would be displayed on a flying programme.  In the case of “A” Flight, to which I had been assigned, the flying programme was a template showing individual activity for instructors and students and time of day.  The template was covered with a large sheet of transparent Perspex and details were recorded in “chinagraph” (wax) pencil (easily erasable).  My Flight Commander, the hugely likeable Pete Ash (his opposite number on “B” Flight was the equally personable Stan Witchall), had constructed a flying programme for the day.  In the first box on one of the lines was my name, in the next box an aircraft tail number which had been allocated to me and then, ignoring a number of boxes marking time slots, a long arrow terminating at 1700 hours that day.  This was definitely not micro-management and I very quickly learned how to make the best use of the day’s weather with my new student charges.  For example, there was no use giving formal pre-flight briefs to your students whilst the sun shone if the forecast was for grotty later in the day.  Get airborne, brief whilst walking out, and catch up later.  And which student to fly with first?  Bloggs 1 needed light wind conditions whilst he mastered landings whilst Bloggs 2 would hardly notice wind whilst he struggled with the early upper air exercises.  And do you know, nobody said a bloody supervisory word to me?  I know, in retrospect, that they were watching but they, gloriously, let me get on with it and I relished the responsibility and the challenge.  Before long, I was juggling my 3 or 4 students through a busy flying day, and not wasting any of it.

It was hard work, particularly physically.  After signing for the aircraft we would collect parachutes, sling them over the right shoulder and walk to the aircraft.  At the rear of the wing, pass shoulder straps over the head and hold both with one hand.  Locate the quick release box (QRB) with the other hand, turn slightly clockwise and insert the shoulder lugs with a click.  Then feed each thigh strap under the bottom loop and back onto itself before clicking in the QRB.  Ensure that the QRB is locked and sitting fairly high on the chest so that the seat harness QRB could sit comfortably below. Tighten the whole thing so that you just about cannot stand upright then climb aboard via the left wing trailing edge, stand on the seat and then settle, allowing the chute pack to nestle in the hollow seat.  Once seated, fasten the aircraft shoulder and lap harness and tighten (later, we had a fifth anchor point in the form of a “negative G strap”).  This was done by twisting the knob on the QRB as far as it went, without depressing the thumb catch on the operating knob.  Then, with the knob held in this position, insert the lap straps followed by the shoulder straps.  Finally adjust lap and should straps to ensure the body is held firmly but no excessively tightly, whatever that meant. Next, don the cloth inner helmet and connect the pigtail to the aircraft intercom.  Then, put the bone dome over the cloth helmet and remove the visor cover.  Finally, clip the free end of the H Type Oxygen mask to the other side of the inner helmet.  Phew – good to go.  Strapping to the rear seat I would then wait, an eternity, whilst the student in the front seat struggled with straps and connections.  One could imagine what a challenge this would be, even to the least apprehensive student pilots.  In the summer it was hot on the ground and cold in the air (no heater in the Chipmunk).  One was obliged to dress is case of emergency so bare arms (fire) and comfortable footwear (parachute landing), for example, were out. The seat was uncomfortable and cramped, straining the spine and the noise, despite a flying helmet covered by a protective “bone-dome” was, by today’s standards, the stuff that industrial injury lawyers’ dreams are made of.  In the winter, it was perishing cold in the back, no matter what one wore and one pretty soon lost all sensation in the feet due to the cold.  One instructor at the CFS used to drum his feet on the floor of the back cockpit to keep warm.  Unfamiliar with the aircraft, a fellow student asked the instructor, “what’s that noise?”  Quick as a flash, Steve Holding said, “oh its only the oil pump – sometimes they can be a bit noisy.  If it stops, that’s the time to worry!”  Steve spent the next few hours patiently drumming his feet on the floor throughout each flight only to cease, abruptly, a few days later in the middle of an aerobatic sequence as it all went quiet at the top of a loop.

And so began my flying instructional career.  Flying instruction technique had developed during the First World War when Major Raymond Smith Barry invented the “Gosport System” of flying instruction.  The Gosport System had been used thereafter and Smith Barry’s legacy was very much alive with many of his original observations and notebooks on display in the CFS HQ.  Primary Flying Squadron was, as it says, concerned with the Primary stage of flying instruction, that is, the sequence of instruction given to an ab-initio pilot before the first solo flight. Following aircraft familiarisation and instruction on preparation for flight, subsequent lessons comprised; the effects of the controls, flying in straight and level flight, climbing and descending, how to recover from stall, turns using moderate angles of bank, taking off, and approaching the runway and landing.  All these elements, put together, comprised a “circuit and landing,” the consistent safe execution of which was the pre-requisite of being sent on ones first solo flight, Exercise 13 in the syllabus.

“The first solo flight may be regarded as a milestone in the pupil’s road of progress which indicates the end of one phase of training and the beginning of another.  To the pupil, and his instructor, it is the crowning achievement of all that has gone before, and when successfully completed, it can impart to the pupil a feeling of confidence in his ability in a manner nor possible during dual instruction.  Therefore, it is a most important stage in the pilot’s training.”

So I set about preparing my students for their first solo.  As I said earlier, nobody interfered, and nobody volunteered advice.  But I remember, a few weeks in, mentioning in the crew room over a cup of coffee, that I was having trouble with Bloggs 3 who could not keep straight on the runway during the take off run.  Nobody said anything at the time but later, old and bold instructors sidled up to me; “where’s he looking - at the ground or the horizon?” “What’s he got on his feet – tell him to swop his heavy boots for plimsoles for a while,” and so on.  Advice was always available on request from all the experience of which my Squadron Commander was so proud and most of it extending from WWII.

But as a newly qualified instructor, a B2 QFI, the principle restriction on my competence was authorising first solo flights.  One way of progressing would have been for the B2 to get his students to a certain stage and then formally present them to a more qualified instructor for a first solo check.  There are all sorts of things wrong with this approach, not least of which was putting the poor student under undue pressure.  For me, one day, apparently at random, Pete Ash the Flight Commander told me to take the day off, muttering something about not much going on.  On my return from a day out in York, I found that both my students had completed Exercise 13 and that I was to resume their training in circuit consolidation.  The sense of confidence I achieved was just as significant as the sense of achievement felt by my students for I had learned a vital lesson – I now knew what standard a student should reach before he was fit for solo.  At the same time, my flight commander had just exercised a highly effective quality check on the standard of my instruction.  One of the students, by the way, was Acting Pilot Officer Mike Rudd who subsequently did rather well in his flying career.

Wednesday 21 November 2018

2/10 - Must Try Harder

Theresa May says the withdrawal agreement is as good as it gets. In thrall to her unaccountable  negotiators, she  tells us one thing then wrings her hands and does another, always in the national interest, of course. I remind her of the words of a rather more principled Conservative predecessor, "whatever the true interest of our country calls for is always possible.”

He also said: "all political lives, unless they are cut off in midstream at a happy juncture, end in failure, because that is the nature of politics and of human affairs."

Saturday 17 November 2018

Heads They Win, Tails We Lose


The prime Minister concluded her Lancaster House speech, now of merely academic interest, thus:

“so that when future generations look back at this time, they will judge us not only by the decision that we made, but by what we made of that decision.”

Quite so, and with all the hubris of the time now a distant memory and the establishment congratulating themselves on thwarting the people, again, we should reflect on what remains of Brexit aspiration.  Actually, less than nothing for, as John Redwood points out, all we have done is surrender our Article 50 right to leave the EU (and we still pay them £39 Billion for the privilege).  A few token resignations will not prevent Mrs May from shoring up her fragile position.  She will win the vote of no confidence, when it comes, and, even if the margin is a single vote, she will forge ahead with her “deal.”  Some commentators even think she will succeed in forcing it through Parliament by threatening her opponents with watering it down still further in order to recruit more allies to see it through.  In other words, take this now or see any semblance of separation disappear in smoke.
Meantime, No 10 seems to be bulldozing their self-righteous path as though nothing has happened with Mrs May promising a Boycott-like innings.  Before she gets carried away with this metaphor, however, she should bear in mind that, despite his professional accomplishments and previous Chairmanship, Geoffrey was rejected by the members in his bid to re-join the Committee of Yorkshire Country Cricket Club a couple of years back.  A new Minister for Brexit has been appointed despite Fraser Nelson observing that he could not think of anyone with sufficient lack of integrity to take the job.  Party Chairmen are being consulted directly and, apparently, MPs are being urged to consult their constituents.  I shall not be holding my breath in Selby & Ainsty where Nigel Adams has not favoured me with a communication on the subject since he was appointed Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Wales Office and Assistant Government Whip.  Over the road, in Elmet & Rothwell, Alec Shelbrooke was seen on TV last night backing the PM and, apparently, singing the hymm sheet helpfully provided by the clergyman's daughter for various Vicars of Bray.  It seems many MPs will be taking the opportunity of the weekend break to park principle in favour of pragmatism and maintaining their position on the greasy pole.  That said, I must acknowledge the gallant and principled stance of some members, paticularly in the northern borders of my native county, Northumberland.

Remember, they are all in it together and you and I have no chance, even having won a referendum.  To take your mind off it, why not go and see the new film Wildlife?  An absorbing narrative, beautifully photographed and splendidly portrayed by a terrific cast including Carey Mulligan, will provide an artistic diversion from the undignified events in Westminster.